[ arbor : tree ] + [ borealis : northern ]

“for the considerations therein mentioned”

or, What a Memorial of an Indented Deed is, and what it isn’t.

During the past few months, while transcribing and indexing memorials of Irish deeds, I’ve noticed certain legal terms and turns of phrase. Historic newspapers are the same way: after a time, you begin to recognize patterns in language and style, and to understand contemporary expressions or idioms that have since become obsolete. In the case of the memorials, this holds true, but it would seem that, on occasion, a memorial was also a case of what was not being said, or was barely hinted or winked at.

Title of drawing: A Local Court (1832), depicting magistrates, jury members, and people in attendance in an uproar; to illustrate the blog article entitled, "for the considerations therein mentioned."
A Local Court. Held by the British Museum (London); archival ref. 1865,111,2510. Associated title, “Observations on the rejected Local Courts’ Jurisdiction Bill.” Published in London (UK), 1832. Digital image online (accessed 2021-05-22). Non-commercial use of this image was permitted under Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. — Readers are encouraged to read the British Museum’s terms of use for this image.

For example, after stating that Party A had transferred or conveyed a parcel of land (or a tenement, park, etc.) to Party B, many memorials contain the phrase, “for the considerations therein mentioned.” The reader is left with many unanswered questions, such as, what was given up by Party B in order to obtain the property of interest? Who benefitted by this transaction, and by how much? Alternatively, did Party B convey something to A that A desperately required? Did the property approximate the value of the consideration? What form did the consideration take—was it money, a promise of money, a debt instrument, a partition of property?

What price had been exacted, and on what terms, exactly??

To illustrate, we might consider the memorial of indented deeds of lease and release executed by William Stevenson of Edinburgh and his son, James Stevenson of Stewartstown, on 24 & 25 April 1751.1 The essential facts of the transaction were recorded: the names of the contracting parties and their domiciles; a detailed description of what properties were conveyed by the Messrs. Stevenson; the names and domiciles of the witnesses; an indication as to which witnesses signed the memorial; the date, time, and place of registry; and the name and title of the registrar. However, nowhere was it stated what Mr. Craig and Mr. Kirk conveyed in return, and on what conditions.

Instead, the memorial states only that the properties were granted “for the considerations therein mentioned,” to Mr. Craig “to the Intent & purpose in the s’d Deed of Release Expressed.” It’s as if these phrases were used deliberately, to cast a veil over the true nature or the fundamental bargain that was struck. This particular deed, then, provides an excellent example of an important feature of the registry system, that is, a memorial is not necessarily a true copy of a deed or conveyance.

In fact, the statute, or act, which gave rise to the registration of memorials in 1707—the Registration of Deeds Act (6th Anne, chap. 2)—stipulated that only certain data elements had to be included in a memorial. Indeed (pun acknowledged), one 19th century legal writer prefaced his outline of these elements with the phrase, In order to avoid unnecessary disclosure of private affairs. Thus, the new Act decreed that the memorial of a deed or conveyance need contain only the following information:

  1. the day of the month or year when the deed was executed;
  2. the names and additions of all the parties;
  3. the names of all the subscribing witnesses;
  4. the place of abode of any subscribing witness to the memorial who was not a subscribing witness to the deed or conveyance;
  5. the lands, tenements, and hereditaments contained in such deed or conveyance, and where these lands, &c., were situated, including the names of the counties, baronies, cities, towns, parishes, townlands, &c., in the same manner as these lands, etc. were described in the deed or conveyance.

Any information given above and beyond these requirements, then, is a gift to the genealogist and the local historian. Examples of such bonuses include:

  • a statement of relationship between parties (wife, brother, &c.);
  • the domiciles of any of the parties (except no. 4, above);
  • occupations (farmer, weaver, merchant, peruke maker, &c.);
  • titles (Esq., Gent., &c.);
  • birth order of sons or daughters named in terms of lives;
  • whether one of the contracting parties or witnesses had died between the time the deed was executed and the date that the memorial was registered;
  • expression of paternal affection for one’s son as the basis, or partial basis, for executing a deed; and of course,
  • the amount of monies or other financial instruments which had, or would, exchange hands.

Likely, the parties, aided no doubt by their legal advisors, added such details to clarify their intents and purposes, and to avoid mistakes in interpretation.

Returning to the transaction whereby William Stevenson and James Stevenson granted most of their lands in the parish of Donaghenry, taken by itself, the Memorial doesn’t tell us much. Instead, we have to consider it in the context of other memorials (including their dates of registration) and archival documents. For instance, in his last will and testament, proved four years earlier in 1747,2 Capt. James Stevenson referred to the considerable indebtedness of his unfortunate son William. From this date, a series of other deeds, together with biographical notes penned by one of his sons, suggest that the deeds of lease and release of 1751 may have involved a mortgage of the property, subject to the usual clause of redemption with interest and costs. If this were the case, then William would have been in a position to repay some or all of his debts and to start anew as a merchant in Edinburgh.

I will close this blog article with a list of references that have assisted my lay understanding of the registration of deeds in Ireland. Needless to say, this list is hardly exhaustive, and there are any number of modern works written on the subject.

  • Registration of Deeds,” by John Smith Furlong and Edmund R. Digues Latouche. Chapter II in, The Law of Landlord and Tenant as Administered in Ireland. Vol. I. (Dublin: Edward Ponsonby, 1869.) — The authors outline the development of the system with reference to the various statutes, in chronological order. In this way, the reader may know which statutes prevailed on particular dates. Sections 1 and 3 are highly recommended.
  • A Treatise on the Law of Landlord and Tenant in Ireland, 2nd ed., by John Finlay, LL.D. (Dublin: John Cumming, 1835). — This book is available online at

Source citation for this page: — Kilpatrick, Alison. “for the considerations therein mentioned;” or, What a Memorial of an Indented Deed is, and what it isn’t.” Alison Kilpatrick ©2016. Published to Arborealis, online at, accessed [insert date of access.].

See also:
Introductory notes about registered deeds and the memorials (copies) thereof
Scope of Irish deeds covered
Notes about the indexes provided on Arborealis :: — Surname indexes — Subject indexes
Notes about the transcripts of memorials of Irish deeds posted to Arborealis
List of blog articles pertaining to memorials of Irish deeds
— Nick Reddan’s Registry of Deeds Index Project Ireland website


  1. Registry of Deeds, Ireland. Memorial no. 149-202-99462: Stevenson & Stevenson to Craig (lease and release; dated 1751-04-24; registered 1751-07-05). Digital image online at FamilySearch, Int’l., per FHL film no. 461356. Transcribed by Alison Kilpatrick, and submitted to Nick Reddan’s Registry of Deeds Index Project Ireland, 2016-08-18.
  2. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Belfast. Copy Will of James Stevenson; administration granted, 22 January 1747. PRONI ref. T1009/16. Transcribed and annnotated by Alison Kilpatrick, 2016.